Posts
296
Joined
3/2/2011
Location
San Diego, CA
US
Fantasy
29th
Red Bull Hardline is taking place this weekend, and in case you haven't seen any of the action, this year's track looks bigger and gnarlier than ever. The events creator/builder, Dan Atherton, has not held back, and the track features two new jumps over 100 ft long (30 meters). The Fest Series has been pushing the limits of jump sizes for years, but that is in a session format, not midway down one of the wildest downhill tracks in the world.
I've had a hard time watching highlights from the first day of practice knowing how high the risk is on most features. And it made me wonder if sending racers down a track with such high consequences was irresponsible or just part of pushing the sport.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9kmn-oA2hQ
I've had a hard time watching highlights from the first day of practice knowing how high the risk is on most features. And it made me wonder if sending racers down a track with such high consequences was irresponsible or just part of pushing the sport.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9kmn-oA2hQ
That said, giant jumps that are bike breaking are probably "too far". Once we get to a certain size we sort of have to stop going further. Not because of pure physics or anything, but because the margin for error and consequence gets too big. A tiny gust of wind, suspension oil being to hot/cold/whatever, etc all can result in life changing injury.
Guys on moto routinely jump 100 ft+ but they have a motor to control a lot of what is happening in the air, and the bikes are an order of magnitude more stable. Put another way, they are nowhere near as close to the "line" as non-motorized riders are.
Invited. Tour the gnar, for real.
https://instagram.com/stories/redbulluk/2924155676860053813?igshid=YmMy…
The format isn't as much of a life/death risk to the crew at this event. They have the mentality that suits the features of this track. You & I are viewing it through a different perspective.
The guys at this event are the risk takers of the sport whether this event existed or not. They'd be out someplace else hunting this same rush if they weren't at HardLine
@eoin, just because someone can't spell doesn't mean they should be banned : ) most of the replies are legit discussion.
Very impressive is Jackson Goldstones 3rd place qualifying run. What can't this kid do?
I've also been a bit dubious about this whole thing over the last few days. For me, it's hard to let go of DH racing once the season ends, and I get sucked into this event with way too much expectation. I've seen every edition of hardline (replays, then broadcast since 2018), but this year something in the back of the brain just doesn't agree with all the hype. So I looked up the race reports and put the data into a spreadsheet... nerdy yes, but no risk of a broken collarbone.
My conclusion is that it's not progressing the sport.
Including tomorrow's race (if everyone starts), there have only been 57 (!) participants in 8 editions. I didn't add nationalities to my chart but at first glance over 85% of these riders are GB/NZ/AU/CA... union jackked.
There have been five winners in 8 years. All of them from Great Britain.
The world's best racers do not come to this event:
Presuming everyone who rode qualifying today (including the DNSs and DNFs), and not counting tomorrow's four first-timers: 36% of Red Bull Hardline participants (20 out of 56 participants) in the now 8 editions of this "race" have NOT returned for a second time. This includes 3 world champions (Danny Hart, Loic Bruni, Reece Wilson) and 2 WC race winners (Mick Hannah and Brook MacDonald) . The only two riders have won a WC and participated at this event more than once are Gee Atherton (2x world champ) and Laurie Greenland.
The median number of participations per rider is 2 (out of eight). If we look at how many people are continuously trying to qualify week-in/week-out for an elite men's WC, this is totally out of touch with reality. Not-entering 75% of the total possible events isn't a realistic outcome for professional athletes. So, this is an event that favours daredevils, not racers.
Methinks this hardline business has been blown out of proportion. Marketing and publicity will get us all to believe that black is white and less is more.
Finally, everyone can say, "well, don't watch." Fair. But I do watch, because that's exactly what the organisers and athletes want need me to do, plus I'm interested in the content. If I (we) don't watch, they wouldn't be there. That's a fact.
But I'm at the point now where I'm going to stop watching this stuff. Happy for Jess Blewitt that she got to have fun and break her collarbone. More power to her. Happy they've bulldozed the line down a once insane, steep, remote hilltop in a land I've never been to. More power to 'em. But I don't resonate with it... I don't want to see anyone get hurt doing something they love, I don't want to see girls do shit that men with twice their body mass and bone density can't even handle. I don't ride flow trails, and I sure as shit don't contemplate 100 foot jumps. Best of luck to Red Bull, but they're not progressing me deeper into the sport.
Middle-aged man, who actually spends a boat-load of money on bikes, components, subscriptions, travel, and taxes... over and out.
Afterthought: I want my kids to watch WC DH and I encourage them to become world champions. That entails a lot of "boring, adult" stuff which is categorically denied or ignored at Hardline... starting and finishing the qualifying fun, for example...
https://youtu.be/Kwm32VCI6x8
Post a reply to: Has Red Bull Hardline gone too far?